Optimum management for complex anal fistula: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background: Complex anal fistula has a high recurrence rate and disturbing surgical complications, which are frustrating for patients and challenging for surgeons. Although single or combined management methods have produced positive outcomes, no trials have simultaneously compared these therapies. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the management method for complex anal fistula with the lowest failure and complication rates. Methods: This network meta-analysis (NMA) was registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO; CRD42023393349). Randomized controlled trials that analyzed complex anal fistula management were obtained from Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane using representative keywords. The primary outcome was the failure of anal fistulas to heal (including recurrences) after 6 to 12 months. The secondary outcome was fecal incontinence. All statistical analysis was conducted within the Bayesian framework using BUGSnet 1.1.0 in R Studio. A forest plot and league table were used to present the results. Results: A total of 19 studies containing 15 interventions, 1844 subjects, and 104 pairwise comparisons were analyzed quantitatively. The lowest failure rates occurred with ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) + Plug (RR 0.2; 95 % CI 0.01-2.65), LIFT + platelet-rich plasma (PRP) (RR 0.22; 95 % CI 0.01-2.89), and FSR (RR 0.26; 95 % CI 0.02-2.12) relative to drainage seton. LIFT combined with other management methods showed lower fecal incontinence rates than the other treatments. Conclusion: The combination of LIFT with plug or PRP resulted in lower failure and complication rates in the management of complex anal fistula compared to the other methods tested.

Anastomosis selection in liver transplantation for recipients with unusable recipient hepatic arteries: a bayesian network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The anastomosis of donor and recipient hepatic arteries is standard in liver transplantations. For transplant recipients with unusable hepatic arteries, appropriate artery selection should be conducted using evidence-based considerations; therefore, this network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to analyze the most suitable alternative recipient artery for anastomosis during liver transplantations. METHODS: Comprehensive searches of the Scopus, Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE databases were conducted to analyze observational studies containing non-standard anastomoses in liver transplantations that used the splenic artery, aorta, celiac, or branches of the gastric artery. The outcome parameters included intraoperative components, complications, and survival data. This NMA used the BUGSnet package in R studio and the results were presented in a Forest plot, league table, and SUCRA plot. RESULTS: Among the 13 studies included in this NMA, 5 arteries were used for the anastomoses. The splenic artery anastomosis showed a high risk of thrombosis and a low risk of stenosis (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.13-3.14) and biliary tract abnormalities (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.36-1.55). In addition, the graft survival (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.96-1.23) and overall survival (1-year survival OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.94-1.26; 5-year survival OR 1.95% CI 0.83-1.22) showed favorable results using this artery. Constraints to the use of the splenic artery were longer operation and cold ischemic times. However, the duration of hospital stay (MD 1.36, 95% CI -7.47 to 10.8) was shorter than that when the other arteries were used, and the need for blood transfusions was minimal (MD -1.74, 95% CI -10.2 to 6.7). CONCLUSION: In recipients with unusable hepatic arteries, the splenic artery of the patient should be the first consideration for anastomosis selection in liver transplantations.

The Mutation Portraits of Oncogenes and Tumor Supressor Genes in Predicting the Overall Survival in Pancreatic Cancer: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: In pancreatic cancer, the carcinogenesis can not be separated from genetics mutations. The portraits of genes alterations majorily including oncogenes (KRAS, HER2, PD-L1) and tumor supressor genes (P53, CDKN2A, SMAD4). Besides being notorious a screening marker, the genetic mutations were related to the prognosis of pancreatic cancer. The aim of this study is to determine the genetic mutations portrait in predicting the overall survival in pancreatic cancer. METHODS: The network meta analysis (NMA) was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023397976) and conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols) in addition of NMA extension guidance. Comprehensive searches were done including all studies which reported the overall survival of pancreatic cancer subjects with KRAS, HER2, PD-L1, P53, CDKN2A, SMAD4. Data were collected and analysis will be done based on Bayesian method, Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm, using BUGSnet package in R studio. Transivity was controlled by methods and consistency of the NMA will be fitted by deviance information criterion. Data analysis in NMA were presented in Sucra plot, league table, and forest plot. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies were included in this NMA with 4613 total subjects. The NMA was conducted in random-effects, consistent, and convergence model. Relative to control, the genetic mutation of SMAD4 (HR 1.84; 95%CI 1.39-2.46), HER2 (HR 1.76; 95%CI 1.14-2.71), and KRAS (HR 1.7; 95%CI 1.19-2.48) were significant to have worse survival. The mutations of PD-L1, P53, and CDKN2A also showed poor survival, but not statistically significant compared to control. CONCLUSION: In pancreatic cancer, the mutation of SMAD4 predicted the worst overall survival, compared to control, also mutation of HER2, KRAS, PD-L1, P53, and CDKN2A.

The neuroprotective effect of statin in traumatic brain injury: A systematic review.

Despite recent encouraging pharmaceutical and technical breakthroughs in neurosurgical critical care, traumatic brain injury (TBI)-related mortality and morbidity remain substantial clinical issues. Medication of statins was revealed to enhance outcomes following TBI in animal research. In addition to their main role of decreasing serum cholesterol, statins decrease inflammation and enhance cerebral blood flow. However, research on the efficacy of statins in TBI is still limited. This systematic review was conducted to determine the efficacy of statins in enhancing the clinical outcomes of TBI individuals, and specifically investigate the optimal dose and form of statins. The databases of PubMed, DOAJ, EBSCO, and Cochrane were extensively researched. The date of publication within the last fifteen years was the inclusion criterion. Meta-analyses, clinical trials, and randomized controlled trials were prioritized forms of research publications. Ambiguous remarks, irrelevant correlations to the main issue, or a focus on disorders other than TBI were the exclusion criteria. Thirteen research were included in this study. Simvastatin, atorvastatin, and rosuvastatin were the main form of statins discussed in this study. Enhancement of the Glasgow Coma Scale, survival rates, hospital length of stay, and cognitive outcomes were revealed in this study. This study suggests either simvastatin 40 mg, atorvastatin 20 mg, or rosuvastatin 20 mg for 10 days as the optimal therapeutic forms and doses to be applied in the management of TBI. Pre-TBI statin use was linked to lower risk of mortality in TBI individuals compared to nonusers, whereas statin discontinuation was linked to an increase in mortality.

A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Biliary Stent Types' Outcome and Complications in Unresectable Malignant Biliary Obstructions.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) in comparing biliary stents types' outcomes and complications in unresectable MBO. METHODS: The study was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA and NMA extension . Comprehensive searches of the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Scopus were done analyzing randomized controlled trials that included subjects with unresectable malignant biliary obstructions that underwent biliary stents placement from any approaches. The types of stents that included were full-covered metal (FMS), partially-covered metal (PMS), uncovered metal (UMS), plastic (PLS), Iodine-125 seeds strands (IRS), antireflux (ARS), and paclitaxel-coated (PXS) stents. The outcome parameters were clinical success, median patency duration, medial survival, and early 30-day mortality. The complications included were stent occlusion, stent migration, cholangitis, cholecystitis, pancreatitis, hemorrhage, and hemobilia. The NMA will be done based on Bayesian method, Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm, using BUGSnet package in R studio. Transivity was controlled by methods and consistency of the NMA will be fitted by deviance information criterion. Data analysis in NMA were presented in Sucra plot, league table, and forest plot. RESULT: Thirty-six RCTs were included with 3502 subjects. ARS had the best clinical success and longest median patency. However, it was associated with higher rate of  complications. IRS had a good clinical success (RR 1.63; 95%CI 0.67-6.25), long median patency (MD 21.14; 95%CI -106.18 to 145.91), and high significant survival rate (MD 69.89; 95%CI 22 to 117.57) compared to others stents. It was associated unsignificant complications of cholecystitis, hemobilia, and hemorrhage. CONCLUSION: Iodine-125 seeds strands had the promising good outcome and tolerated complications among others and should be considered as a standard stent to be used in unresectable malignant biliary obstructions.

S100B Serum Level as a Mortality Predictor for Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The pathogenesis of inflammatory neuronal cell damage will continue after traumatic brain injury in which contributed to subsequent mortality. Serum S100B levels were shown to be an early predictor of mortality due to traumatic brain injury. AIM: This Meta-Analysis will analyse the mean and diagnostic strength of serum S100B levels between survived and died subjects with head injuries based on the various follow-up times of nine studies. METHODS: We conducted a meta-anelysis in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and adhering to Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Review of Interventions. Literature search was conducted on March 16, 2018 from Medline and Scopus in the past 10 years, using various keywords related to S100, brain injury, and outcome. Duplicate journals were sorted out via EndNote. Included articles were as follows: original data from the group, clinical trials, case series, patients undergoing serum S100B levels with both short- and long-term follow-up mortality. Data were collected for mortality, serum S100B levels, and its diagnostic strength. All data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.3 (Cochrane, Denmark). RESULTS: The results of the meta-analysis showed a significant difference in S100B levels between survived and died subjects with head injuries on overall follow-up timeline (0.91, 95.9% CI 0.7-1.12, I2 = 98%, p < 0.001), during treatment (1.43, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.89, I2 = 98%, p < 0.001), or 6 months (0.19; 95%CI 0.1-0.29, I2 = 76%, p < 0.001) with an average threshold value that varies according to the study method used. The mean diagnostic strength was also promising to predict early mortality (sensitivity of 77.18% and 92.33%, specificity of 78.35% and 50.6%, respectively). CONCLUSION: S100B serum levels in the future will be potential biomarkers, and it is expected that there will be standardised guidelines for their application.